IDENTITYWORKS.COM Reviews NotedProBonoIssuesArticlesToolsIdentity ForumSpaethContact
Home > Reviews > Criteria

Overview

2013 Programs

2012 Programs

2011 Programs

2010 Programs

2009 Programs

2008 Programs

2007 Programs

2006 Programs

2005 Programs

2004 Programs

2003 Programs

2002 Programs

2001 Programs

2000 Programs

1999 Programs

1998 Programs

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 



[ Site Map ]

Criteria for case selection

I am often asked how I choose cases to note, or to review. It's simple:  I'll see a rebranding launch ad (usually in the NY Times or Wall Street Journal) that makes me want to learn more.  Some leading firms share their news with me. And many friends of Identityworks will alert me to something they have seen; I am grateful for this network.

I am also happy to consider reviewing branding/rebranding programs submitted by professional firms or their clients. The stories I like to tell usually meet these criteria:

1)   Corporate – institutional, not just a marketing brand
2)   Strategically interesting rebranding which can be seen as an act of leadership, involving management purposes such as  repositioning or cultural change
3)   Creative excellence: well-planned and well designed (and openly credited)
4)   Reasonably important institution – not necessarily internationally known, but easy to explain (and learn from)
5)   Well documented (and team members are available for interviews)
6)   Logo files available, old as well as new  (high definition)
7)   Fresh, reasonably newsworthy.

It helps, too, if it is a potential Corporate Brand Matrix case (same criteria, but can be documented in more depth and detail).

To suggest a case, please send story-telling materials like :

• News releases, from company and/or agency , if available
• Other forms of internal & external announcement
• Interview contact information, both company and consultant/designer
• Hi-resolution logo files, old as well as new
• One or two application photos


Tony Spaeth 

^ top of page