|
|
|
Bausch & Lomb
New: Logo, 'icon,' visual system, and
product rebrandings
Launched: January 6, 2010, via Website
conversion and press release
Story in brief:
We last reviewed Bausch & Lomb in
2004, when
then-CEO Ron Zarrella used a ‘lightpath’ symbol to express the
company’s newly narrower focus on eye care products (like contact
lenses). Just six years later, we are seeing another reinvention
of B+L. What happened?
Virtually everything is substantially new,
including the company’s owners and leadership. In 2006, there was a
spot of bother (having to do with fungal infections and "Re-Nu," a key
eye-care product). The stock tanked, putting B&L in play. In 2007 it
was bought by private investors Warburg Pincus, who soon replaced
Zarrella with Gerald Ostrov (who had led Johnson & Johnson’s
Worldwide Vision Care businesses). Two years of rebuilding followed
in which Ostrov strengthened the company’s pharmaceutical and
surgical offerings, in effect expanding upon its focus on
lens-related eye care to become (more credibly now) an "eye health"
company.
The latest rebranding, thus, can be seen both as a
broadening of scope, and as a discrete but visible call for fresh attention and
respect. As Ostrov put it, “Our new corporate identity reflects
the ongoing evolution of Bausch + Lomb as we make strides in growing
our business…”
Having recruited Carol Panzer (also from J&J) to head up
"corporate advertising & market intelligence," Ostrov had charged her
to review the company's entire brand portfolio. Carol retained strategist
Fran Gormley, who had previously worked with her on J&J initiatives;
and Fran, having worked with Paula Scher on a Citi
project, then proposed addition of Pentagram to the brand team.
Looking at drugstore shelves, Scher was dismayed to see how
cluttered and chaotic packaging has become, in eye care and other
categories, pharmaceutical as well as OTC . She saw an opportunity
to restore some design clarity reminiscent of the best work of the
50s and 60s (as for CIBA Geigy). So Pentagram responded with a
comprehensive view of the potential redesign of Bausch & Lomb,
brands and all, in support of a more coherent and impactful
corporate whole. Redesign of the corporate brand itself thus
was a logical extension (and organizing concept) of redesign of the
category brands, and was embraced by management as a logical
reflection of the company's evolution.
Appropriately, redesign of the "Re-Nu" brand would lead the way,
and its launch would also require the reveal of the new corporate
branding. Reportedly many more product and media redesigns are
in the Pentagram pipeline, and new ads are coming, so we can expect to see a continuing
reveal of this corporate rebranding throughout 2010.
For maximum flexibility and marketing utility, the new corporate
identifier is configured both as a wordmark and as a supplementary initials-based
"B+L" symbol – an
unusual tactic. (While consumers know the company by its full name,
the medical community is more likely to use the initials.) Pentagram
"seriously redrew" the sturdy Nobel typeface to provide
the cool,
confident wordmark (and a secondary 'house font' as well). The
previous ampersand was replaced with a '+' mark for its universal association
with 'health,' as well as for distinctiveness.
B+L noted its rebranding publically in a January 6
press release (graciously crediting Pentagram), but with no
other fanfare... no announcement ads or launch ceremony (employees
had been pre-notified in November). According to
Mike McDougall, VP Corporate
Communications & Public Affairs, management prefers to see this
corporate rebranding not as a tool for change but as a reflection of
change already achieved, and not as a significant event but as
a low-key (and low cost) evolutionary process.
C.E.O. - Gerald M. Ostrov
C.B.O. - Carol Panzer, VP Corporate Advertising &
Market Intelligence
Identity strategy - Fran Gormley (Greenwich Marketing)
Identity design - Pentagram; Paula Scher, with Lisa
Kitschenberg
First Impressions:
Strategy: You can have it both
ways, stimulating as well as reflecting change. This
institutional rebranding seems to me by any measure a
watershed event in the company's renewal, and an occasion for
celebration. It demonstrates the ability of an identity
change, if not the admitted intent, to help redefine institutional direction,
encourage global teamwork, and restore a more positive image trajectory,
as well as to turbo-charge marketing initiatives. Its leaders, planners and designers alike merit
recognition for a job well done.
Design: Note the significant change in design
strategy, from FutureBrand's 2004 logo-dominated identity to
Pentagram's more comprehensive visual-system approach, anchored
in a more reserved and coolly institutional logo (with a
European aura). This can enable a game-changing upgrade in market
presence; its effectiveness over time, however, will depend more
heavily on the company's commitment (and ability) to sustain the
required breadth and depth of design quality.
Corporate Brand Matrix ratings:
0%
structural, 100% strategic, 0% functional (est.)
(Full report in process.)
|
2004 by FutureBrand


Packages carry both wordmark and icon
(see more
at Pentagram)

CEO Gerald Ostrov
|
|