IDENTITYWORKS.COM Reviews NotedProBonoIssuesArticlesToolsIdentity ForumSpaethContact
Home > Reviews > 2009 Programs > Reckitt Benckiser

Overview

2012 Programs

2011 Programs

2010 Programs

2009 Programs

2008 Programs

2007 Programs

2006 Programs

2005 Programs

2004 Programs

2003 Programs

2002 Programs

2001 Programs

2000 Programs

1999 Programs

1998 Programs

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 



[ Site Map ]

Reckitt Benckiser

New:  Logo and visual system

Launched:  February 17, 2009

Story in brief:
Ten years after very British Reckitt & Colman (having previously spun out its Colman food businesses) merged with Holland's Benckiser  to become  Reckitt Benckiser, "the world no.1 in household cleaning, " CEO Bart Brecht has decided to freshen the corporate brand, adding a "pink kite containing the letters rb," whose design has been credited to a London branding agency, The Workroom.  (There is a The Workroom in Chicago too -- no relation.)

The company's intentions, as reported by Miranda Fitzgerald for MarketingMagazine.co.uk, are "to raise its profile and position it as 'the power behind the power brands'." This is significant, a recognition that in our times, we need to know who is making the brand promise, too.

More to come, as we learn more from the source.

Credits:
C.E.O. - Bart Becht
Identity design
-  The Workroom (London)
 

First Impressions:
Business strategy: TBD, pending further information
Creative strategy:
We can imagine the debate: "Can we afford to lose Benckiser yet? No? Then to be friendlier, maybe we should encourage 'RB' . Everybody calls us that anyway!" That's often delusional.
Design execution:
Given the name decision plus the (RB) name-mitigation decision, the pink kite is a lovely and appealing presence. The wordmark is decent (save the dots on the i's, a distraction); the color palette (see Website) imposes a strong if demanding corporate personality. And dig the soundtrack. They're serious!

Other Comments:
Bart Becht has been too quiet about this rebranding. (There wasn't even a corporate press release on it.)  This silence can too easily be seen as disdain for its importance, or even as a lack of confidence in it.  If the purpose is indeed to show "the power behind," for goodness sake show some pride in it!
 

Corporate Brand Matrix ratings:  
0% structural,  100% strategic,  0% functional (est.)







 

      The former mark, whose kissing Ks (and hidden arrow) expressed the 1999 merger...


 

 

 

 

 

 


                              CEO Bart Becht

^ top of page