IDENTITYWORKS.COM Reviews NotedProBonoIssuesArticlesToolsIdentity ForumSpaethContact
Home > Reviews > 2000 Programs > Verizon

Overview

2012 Programs

2011 Programs

2010 Programs

2009 Programs

2008 Programs

2007 Programs

2006 Programs

2005 Programs

2004 Programs

2003 Programs

2002 Programs

2001 Programs

2000 Programs

1999 Programs

1998 Programs

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 



[ Site Map ]

VERIZON: Good name (my call), less-good logo

A use of identity, by a leader

New: Verizon name and logo

Launched: Announced April 3, 2000; advertising broke August 1

Story in brief:
With global aspirations, Bell Atlantic was overdue for a name change... and thought about it in 1997 when they acquired NYNEX, but backed off. In 2000, acquisition of GTE provided another opportunity.

Strategically, renaming was a no-brainer. That doesn't make it easy. Three agencies were engaged and 8000 names looked at before Verizon, from a 1997 list, cleared.

Credits:
C.E.O. - As co-CEOs, Charles R. Lee and Ivan Seidenberg share the credit.
Naming - Lippincott & Margulies, Landor and DeSola Group were all involved.
Identity design -Landor Associates designed the red V and black wordmark. DeSola Group designed the red Z and the implementation.

First Impressions:
Although many people love to hate the name, it is technically functional, effective and personally I find it appealing.

The logo is a different matter. Because the V and Z compete for both attention and esthetic influence, the mark itself is cluttered; it tends to degrade rather than enhance anything it appears on. A lesser concern: consistency is problematic, in both shape and color. In horizontal spaces, the V moves to the left, resulting in a different shape and relationship. Red and black look great on a white field (like the trucks) but in reverse, the mark collapses: the white forms 'pop' while the red ones recede, leaving us with 'veri on.' For reverse applications, the all-white version works better.

The mark has been further prostituted by use of the V in advertising as merely a checkmark, robbing it of more imaginative significance (and distorting its shape in the process.)
























^ top of page Other 2000 reviews >